From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tisdale v. Clark Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 18, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cv-01139-MMD-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-01139-MMD-NJK

01-18-2013

SHERON O. TISDALE, Plaintiff, v. CLARK COUNTY, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff seeks an extension of time for her to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time until January 29, 2013, to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. However, the Court will not entertain another request to extend this deadline.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's amended motion for extension (dkt. no. 56) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for extension (dkt. no. 55) is DENIED AS MOOT.

______________________

MIRANDA M. DU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tisdale v. Clark Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 18, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cv-01139-MMD-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Tisdale v. Clark Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:SHERON O. TISDALE, Plaintiff, v. CLARK COUNTY, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 18, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-01139-MMD-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 18, 2013)