From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tipton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Dec 16, 2003
122 S.W.3d 715 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 82380

December 16, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Larry L. Kendrick, Judge.

Gwenda R. Robinson, District Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Patrick T. Morgan, Assistant Attorney General, MO, for Respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary R. Russell, J.



ORDER


Appellant, Tyrone M. Tipton ("Movant"), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant pleaded guilty to three separate causes at the same time. In the first cause, Movant was convicted of burglary in the second degree, section 569.170 RSMo 2000, and stealing, section 570.030. In the second cause, Movant was convicted of burglary in the second degree, section 569.170 and stealing: third offense, sections 570.030 and 570.040. In the third cause, Movant was convicted of stealing: third offense, sections 570.030 and 570.040. In all counts, Movant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender. Movant was sentenced on the first cause to twenty years imprisonment for second degree burglary and to a concurrent term of ten years for stealing over $750. On the second cause, Movant was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment for second degree burglary and to a concurrent term of ten years for stealing: third offense. This sentence is to run concurrently with the sentence on the first cause. On the third cause, Movant was sentenced to ten years imprisonment for stealing: third offense, to run consecutively to the sentences in the first two causes. We affirm.

All statutory references are to RSMo 2000 unless otherwise indicated.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Tipton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Dec 16, 2003
122 S.W.3d 715 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Tipton v. State

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE M. TIPTON, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Dec 16, 2003

Citations

122 S.W.3d 715 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Tipton v. Purkett

Petitioner filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035, which…