From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tipton v. Mohr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 11, 2012
Civil Action 2:11-cv-00719 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00719

06-11-2012

JASON TIPTON, Plaintiff, v. GARY MOHR, et al., Defendants.


Judge Michael H. Watson

Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers


ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the March 27, 2012 Order and Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 37.) The Magistrate Judge granted Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. The Magistrate Judge, however, recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Jane/John Doe, Sandy Crawford, and Norm Evans pursuant to an initial screen for failure to state a claim. Additionally, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court grant the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of Defendants Gary Mohr, Ed Voorhies, and Gary Craft. (ECF No. 24.)

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in a "waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court." (Order & Report & Recommendation 10, ECF No. 37.) The time period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. No party has objected to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court reviewed the Order and Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to an initial screen, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Jane/John Doe, Sandy Crawford, and Norm Evans are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. Additionally, the Motion of Defendants for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 24) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Gary Mohr, Ed Voorhies, and Gary Croft are DISMISSED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove this action from the Court's pending cases list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

MICHAEL H. WATSON , JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Tipton v. Mohr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 11, 2012
Civil Action 2:11-cv-00719 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Tipton v. Mohr

Case Details

Full title:JASON TIPTON, Plaintiff, v. GARY MOHR, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 11, 2012

Citations

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00719 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 11, 2012)

Citing Cases

Hearld v. Haney

See Club Italia Soccer & Sports Org., Inc. v. Charter Twp. of Shelby, Mich., 470 F.3d 286, 298 (6th Cir.…