From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tipson v. Reyes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 30, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-00530-MMD-VPC (D. Nev. Oct. 30, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-00530-MMD-VPC

10-30-2014

ANTHONY JAMES TIPSON, Plaintiff, v. CATHY REYES, et al. Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MAGISTRATE JUDGE VALIERIE P. COOKE

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (dkt. no. 3) ("R&R") relating to plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (dkt. no. 1) and pro se complaint (dkt. no. 1-1). No objection to the R&R has been filed.

This Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party timely objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, then the court is required to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party fails to object, however, the court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2003) (disregarding the standard of review employed by the district court when reviewing a report and recommendation to which no objections were made); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (reading the Ninth Circuit's decision in Reyna-Tapia as adopting the view that district courts are not required to review "any issue that is not the subject of an objection."). Thus, if there is no objection to a magistrate judge's recommendation, then the court may accept the recommendation without review. See, e.g., Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d at 1226 (accepting, without review, a magistrate judge's recommendation to which no objection was filed).

Nevertheless, this Court finds it appropriate to engage in a de novo review to determine whether to adopt Magistrate Judge Cook's R&R. Upon reviewing the R&R and filings in this case, this Court finds good cause to accept and adopt the Magistrate Judge's R&R in full.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (dkt. no. 3) is accepted and adopted in its entirety.

It is further ordered that plaintiff's application to proceed in form pauperis (dkt. no. 1) is granted.

It is further ordered that the Clerk shall detach and file the complaint (dkt. no. 1-1).

It is further ordered that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice.

DATED THIS 30th day of October 2014.

/s/_________

MIRANDA M. DU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tipson v. Reyes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 30, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-00530-MMD-VPC (D. Nev. Oct. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Tipson v. Reyes

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY JAMES TIPSON, Plaintiff, v. CATHY REYES, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 30, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-00530-MMD-VPC (D. Nev. Oct. 30, 2014)