From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tinston v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 17, 1963
18 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

January 17, 1963


Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: "Does the complaint herein state a cause of action?" Settle order on notice. Motion for an extension of time granted insofar as to extend the time for defendants-respondents to serve their answer to 10 days after service upon the attorneys for plaintiff-appellant of a copy of the order of the Court of Appeals determining defendants-respondents' appeal.

Concur — Rabin, J.P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Tinston v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 17, 1963
18 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Tinston v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. TINSTON v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 17, 1963

Citations

18 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)