From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tinsley v. Yatooma

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 24, 2021
SC: 162041 (Mich. Mar. 24, 2021)

Opinion

SC: 162041

03-24-2021

RONALD TINSLEY, VAN BUREN STEEL, INC., and VAN BUREN PROPERTIES OF MICHIGAN, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NORMAN YATOOMA and NORMAN YATOOMA & ASSOCIATES, PC, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices COA: 349354
Wayne CC: 18-011537-NM

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 13, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2021

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Tinsley v. Yatooma

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 24, 2021
SC: 162041 (Mich. Mar. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Tinsley v. Yatooma

Case Details

Full title:RONALD TINSLEY, VAN BUREN STEEL, INC., and VAN BUREN PROPERTIES OF…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Mar 24, 2021

Citations

SC: 162041 (Mich. Mar. 24, 2021)