Opinion
Argued January 27, 1909
Decided February 9, 1909
Martin Paskus for appellants.
Amos H. Stephens for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Tinsley v. Smith
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 9, 1909
88 N.E. 1130 (N.Y. 1909)
Summaries of
Tinsley v. Smith
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 9, 1909
88 N.E. 1130 (N.Y. 1909)
Case details for
Tinsley v. Smith
Case Details
Full title:ADA V. TINSLEY, Respondent, v . JAMES A. SMITH et al., Co-partners under…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 9, 1909
Citations
88 N.E. 1130 (N.Y. 1909)
194 N.Y. 581