From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tinsley v. Harris

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 4, 2007
228 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-7810.

Submitted: May 16, 2007.

Decided: June 4, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:05-cv-00730-JBF).

James Henry Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, Pender Coward, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


James Henry Tinsley appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tinsley v. Harris, No. 2:05-cv-00730-JBF (E.D.Va. Oct. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Tinsley v. Harris

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 4, 2007
228 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Tinsley v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:James Henry TINSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor HARRIS, Attending…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 4, 2007

Citations

228 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2007)