holding that ordinance failed Central Hudson test where government failed to establish that it was enacted to implement a substantial governmental interest, and refusing to consider “after the fact rationalizations for regulations” in its analysis
Summary of this case from Robert Rubenstein & Rubenstein Law, P.A. v. Fla. Bar & Arlene K. SankelNo. 05-12324.
December 5, 2006.
Appeal from the N.D.Ga., 203 Fed.Appx. 268.
Denial of Rehearing En Banc.
holding that ordinance failed Central Hudson test where government failed to establish that it was enacted to implement a substantial governmental interest, and refusing to consider “after the fact rationalizations for regulations” in its analysis
Summary of this case from Robert Rubenstein & Rubenstein Law, P.A. v. Fla. Bar & Arlene K. SankelIn Tinsley, Pickens County denied eleven of Tinsley's sign permit applications because billboards were prohibited under its 1999 ordinance.
Summary of this case from New S. Media Grp. v. City of Rainbow CityFull title:Tinsley Media, LLC v. Pickens County, GA
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Date published: Dec 5, 2006
True commercial speech encouraging lawful activity does, however, have constitutional protection, as does…
Roma Outdoor Creations v. City of Cumming, Ga.First, the denial of its variance applications constitutes an actual, particularized injury. See Tinsley…