From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tinsky v. Jewish Alliance for Greater R.I.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jun 30, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-0246 (EGS) (D.D.C. Jun. 30, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 14-0246 (EGS)

06-30-2014

CRAIG TINSKY, Plaintiff, v. JEWISH ALLIANCE FOR GREATER RHODE ISLAND, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 25, 2014, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss or, alternatively, to transfer [ECF No. 3]. The Court issued an Order [ECF No. 5] advising the plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion. Specifically, the Order warned the plaintiff that, if he did not file his opposition by June 2, 2014, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor has requested more time to do so. Therefore, the Court will deny the defendants' motion to transfer without prejudice, grant the defendants' motion to dismiss as conceded and dismiss this action without prejudice.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Signed: EMMET G. SULLIVAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Tinsky v. Jewish Alliance for Greater R.I.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jun 30, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-0246 (EGS) (D.D.C. Jun. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Tinsky v. Jewish Alliance for Greater R.I.

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG TINSKY, Plaintiff, v. JEWISH ALLIANCE FOR GREATER RHODE ISLAND, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jun 30, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 14-0246 (EGS) (D.D.C. Jun. 30, 2014)