striking down restriction which prevented sale of patented product in conjunction with feature on which patent had expired, since this would operate to extend the life of the latter patent
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle, m.b.HNo. 623.
February 23, 1960, OCTOBER TERM, 1959.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Albert R. Teare and Jerome F. Kramer for petitioner. John A. Blair for respondent. Reported below: 271 F. 2d 146.
striking down restriction which prevented sale of patented product in conjunction with feature on which patent had expired, since this would operate to extend the life of the latter patent
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle, m.b.HFull title:TINNERMAN PRODUCTS, INC., v. PRESTOLE CORPORATION
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 23, 1960
This court previously has held that although this statute generally bars third party indemnity actions…
Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Armco, Inc.See Carpenter Memorandum. In Support Of Summary Judgment at 27, citing Prestole Corporationv. Tinnerman…