From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tinker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Apr 17, 2001
43 S.W.3d 453 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED78115

Filed: April 17, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, HON. LUCY D. RAUCH

Jennifer S. Walsh, Assistant Public Defender, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J. and Paul J. Simon and Sherri B. Sullivan, JJ.



ORDER


Bennie Tinker, movant, appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. On appeal, movant contends that he received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise the issue of the prosecutor's question at trial regarding movant's failure to make a written statement, and had appellate counsel raised error, the appellate court would have reversed movant's conviction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Tinker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Apr 17, 2001
43 S.W.3d 453 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Tinker v. State

Case Details

Full title:BENNIE TINKER, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Apr 17, 2001

Citations

43 S.W.3d 453 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)