From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tingue v. McCoy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 27, 2002
299 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

91409

Decided and Entered: November 27, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Cayuga Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Daniel Tingue, Romulus, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and, Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized use of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented in the form of the misbehavior report, the positive test results with supporting documentation, and the testimony given by the correction officer who conducted the laboratory testing (see Matter of Ellison v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 800, 801; Matter of Smart v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 606, 607). Contrary to petitioner's assertions, the record establishes both an unbroken chain of custody for his urine sample and full compliance with urinalysis testing procedures, including those relating to the refrigeration of specimens (see 7 NYCRR 1020.4; see also Matter of Peterson v. Goord, 268 A.D.2d 739). The remaining contentions raised herein have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Tingue v. McCoy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 27, 2002
299 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Tingue v. McCoy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DANIEL TINGUE, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH McCOY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 27, 2002

Citations

299 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
749 N.Y.S.2d 749

Citing Cases

Victor v. Goord

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of…

In the Matter of Felton v. Selsky

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting…