From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tiner v. State of Alabama

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 3, 1975
510 F.2d 1363 (5th Cir. 1975)

Opinion

No. 74-3835. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5th Cir., See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

April 3, 1975.

Emily Gassenheimer, Montgomery, Ala. (Court appointed), for petitioner-appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Robert E. Varner, Judge.

Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.



The summary judgment rendered below is vacated and this cause remanded for a hearing to determine whether the appellant deliberately bypassed his state remedies. Should the district court find that appellant did not deliberately bypass such remedies, the constitutional questions presented by the appellant's petition for habeas corpus warrant a full hearing on the merits.


Summaries of

Tiner v. State of Alabama

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 3, 1975
510 F.2d 1363 (5th Cir. 1975)
Case details for

Tiner v. State of Alabama

Case Details

Full title:CECIL TINER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 3, 1975

Citations

510 F.2d 1363 (5th Cir. 1975)