From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tindall v. Stanley

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 31, 2023
No. 20-10903 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2023)

Opinion

20-10903

07-31-2023

CODY TINDALL, Plaintiff, v. JAMES STANLEY, Defendant.


David R. Grand Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF INSURANCE AGREEMENTS (ECF NO. 53)

SHALINA D. KUMAR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 21, 2023, plaintiff Cody Tindall filed his Motion to Compel Production of Insurance Agreements from Defendant. ECF No. 53. On July 24, 2023 defendant filed his response. ECF No. 54. In that response and during a status conference held on July 25, 2023, defendant indicated that counsel for Macomb County agreed to provide the responsive policies.

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to compel is GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED that within three (3) days of the date of the entry of this Order, the defendant shall produce to plaintiff the requested insurance agreements.


Summaries of

Tindall v. Stanley

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 31, 2023
No. 20-10903 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Tindall v. Stanley

Case Details

Full title:CODY TINDALL, Plaintiff, v. JAMES STANLEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 31, 2023

Citations

No. 20-10903 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2023)