From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tindall v. Attorney Discipline Bd.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 6, 2017
SC: 156516 (Mich. Oct. 6, 2017)

Opinion

SC: 156516

10-06-2017

MICHAEL E. TINDALL, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD, Defendant.


Order

156516 & (3) Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 6, 2017

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Tindall v. Attorney Discipline Bd.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 6, 2017
SC: 156516 (Mich. Oct. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Tindall v. Attorney Discipline Bd.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL E. TINDALL, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD, Defendant.

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Oct 6, 2017

Citations

SC: 156516 (Mich. Oct. 6, 2017)