From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Timothy v. Oneida Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Sep 3, 2014
Case No. 4:14-cv-00362-BLW (D. Idaho Sep. 3, 2014)

Summary

dismissing state law claims but not federal ones

Summary of this case from Hall v. Childers

Opinion

Case No. 4:14-cv-00362-BLW

09-03-2014

HEATHER S. TIMOTHY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. ONEIDA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho; DUSTIN W. SMITH, in his capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Oneida County, Idaho; DUSTIN W. SMITH, an individual, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is Plaintiff Heather S. Timothy's Motion to Set Bond (Dkt. 2). The Court has reviewed the record and determined that oral argument will not aid the decisional process. The Motion is therefore at issue. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will set the bond amount at $5000.

ANALYSIS

Plaintiff Heather S. Timothy brings this lawsuit against Oneida County, and Dustin Smith, in his capacity as the prosecuting attorney for Oneida Count and individually, alleging that Defendant unlawfully terminated her employment after she reported to law enforcement that Smith was allegedly misappropriating and misusing public funds from the Prosecutor Officer's budget. Timothy brings both state law wrongful termination claims and federal law due process claims. She asks the Court to set a bond amount.

Section 6-610(2) of the Idaho Code requires a plaintiff to post bond before it initiates suit against a law enforcement officer. The bond requirement does not apply to Timothy's federal claims but it does apply to Timothy's state law claims. Hyde v. Fisher, 152 P.3d 653 (Id.Ct.App. 2007).

The Court has reviewed the Complaint and finds an appropriate bond amount in this case to be $5,000. The Court therefore orders Timothy to obtain the requisite statutory securities within 20 days of the date of this Order and to file such notice with the Court. Failure to obtain the requisite security will result in the dismissal of the state law claims against the individual law enforcement officer. Alternatively, Timothy may file a motion to waive the bond requirement within 20 days of the date of this Order along with the requisite financial affidavits and the Court will determine if the indigency requirements for a waiver have been established.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff Heather S. Timothy's Motion to Set Bond (Dkt. 2) is GRANTED.



2. The Court finds an appropriate bond amount in this case is $5000, to be secured and posted within 20 days of this Order. Alternatively, Timothy may file a motion to waive the bond requirement within 20 days of the date of this Order along with the requisite financial affidavits and the Court will determine if the indigency requirements for a waiver have been established.

DATED: September 3, 2014

/s/_________

B. Lynn Winmill

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Timothy v. Oneida Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Sep 3, 2014
Case No. 4:14-cv-00362-BLW (D. Idaho Sep. 3, 2014)

dismissing state law claims but not federal ones

Summary of this case from Hall v. Childers

stating that the bond requirement applies to state law claims but not federal claims

Summary of this case from Kinghorn v. City of Idaho Falls
Case details for

Timothy v. Oneida Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:HEATHER S. TIMOTHY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. ONEIDA COUNTY, a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

Date published: Sep 3, 2014

Citations

Case No. 4:14-cv-00362-BLW (D. Idaho Sep. 3, 2014)

Citing Cases

Walker v. City of Pocatello

The judges in this Court have previously determined that Idaho's bond requirement applies to a supervising…

Kinghorn v. City of Idaho Falls

Before a plaintiff may file any civil action based on state law against a law enforcement officer for a claim…