From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Timmons v. Wichita Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jun 1, 2021
Case No. 21-1078-JAR-GEB (D. Kan. Jun. 1, 2021)

Opinion

21-1078-JAR-GEB

06-01-2021

PRESTON TAYLOR TIMMONS, Plaintiff, v. WICHITA POLICE DEPARTMENT and CRYSTAL A. SHELL, aka Crystal A. Schell, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JULIE A. ROBINSON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed on May 3, 2021 (Doc. 7). Fourteen days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the Court accepts the recommended decision and adopts it as its own.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that in accordance with the May 3, 2021 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7), Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees (Doc. 3, sealed) is denied and this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a cognizable claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Timmons v. Wichita Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jun 1, 2021
Case No. 21-1078-JAR-GEB (D. Kan. Jun. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Timmons v. Wichita Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:PRESTON TAYLOR TIMMONS, Plaintiff, v. WICHITA POLICE DEPARTMENT and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Jun 1, 2021

Citations

Case No. 21-1078-JAR-GEB (D. Kan. Jun. 1, 2021)