From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Timmons v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 23, 2010
Case No. 2:05-cv-02175-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-cv-02175-MCE-EFB.

July 23, 2010

JILL TELFER, SBN 145450, LAW OFFICES OF JILL TELFER, Sacramento, California, Attorney for Plaintiff, CHARLES TIMMONS.

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY, et al., JEFFREY MICHALOWSKI, Attorney for Defendants, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE.


STIPULATION TO DISMISS THE FIRST CLAIM UNDER THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITY ONLY ; THE FIRST CLAIM IS STILL TO REMAIN UNDER THE CALIFORNIA FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ACT


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff CHARLES TIMMONS and Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., by and through their respective counsel, that Plaintiff hereby dismisses, with prejudice, his claim under the American with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Only the first claim for Disability Discrimination under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, ("FEHA"), namely the Failure to Engage in the Interactive Process, and Failure to Reasonably Accommodate claims remain.

The parties agree not to seek costs or attorney's fees based solely on the dismissal of the ADA claim; provided, however, that UPS does not waive or limit its right to seek prevailing-party costs and attorney's fees at the conclusion of the action under the standards for such costs and fees provided by law.

ORDER

The parties having stipulated and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Timmons v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 23, 2010
Case No. 2:05-cv-02175-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Timmons v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES TIMMONS, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., DOES 1…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 23, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:05-cv-02175-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2010)