From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Timlin v. Odstrcil

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin
May 3, 1950
229 S.W.2d 224 (Tex. Civ. App. 1950)

Opinion

No. 9874.

April 12, 1950. Rehearing Denied May 3, 1950.

Appeal from the District Court, Bexar County, Delos Finch, J.

Lee Minner, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Knox Miller, of San Antonio, for appellees.


This is a venue case, in which appellant, Ward Timlin, sued appellees, John Odstrcil and Otto E. Schkade, residents of Scurry County, for specific performance of a contract for the sale by appellees to appellant of an oil and gas lease on certain lands in Scurry County. The prayer of his petition is that 'upon a hearing hereof he have judgment for specific performance against the defendants vesting title in plaintiff to the oil, gas and mining leases as herein sued for, and for such other and further relief, both general and special, to which plaintiff may be justly entitled.'

In a non-jury trial appellees' pleas of privilege were sustained.

Appellant contends that venue in Bexar County is fixed by the application of Subd. 5, Art. 1995, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St., to the following provision of the alleged contract: $150,000.00 cash, payable as soon as titles are approved, not exceeding 15 days from date of delivery of said abstracts to Frost Natl. Bank, San Antonio, Texas, certified down to date. Assignment to be made in name of Ward Timlin, Hidalgo County, Texas.'

This is not the provision of the contract sued on and hence does not control venue. Ammann v. Daniel Oil Co., Tex.Civ.App., Austin, 220 S.W.2d 181.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Timlin v. Odstrcil

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin
May 3, 1950
229 S.W.2d 224 (Tex. Civ. App. 1950)
Case details for

Timlin v. Odstrcil

Case Details

Full title:TIMLIN v. ODSTRCIL et al

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin

Date published: May 3, 1950

Citations

229 S.W.2d 224 (Tex. Civ. App. 1950)

Citing Cases

Rogers v. Waters

Venue under Section 5 is not controlled by the place where the contract requires the plaintiff to perform,…

Johnson v. U.S. Industries

The settlement agreement provides in effect only that if appellee thereafter sues appellants because of their…