Timke v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Stephens v. State

    360 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)

    AFFIRMED. See Timke v. State, 313 So.3d 714 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020). LAMBERT, C.J., HARRIS and MACIVER, JJ., concur.

  2. Bright v. State

    350 So. 3d 435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

    In reviewing the trial court's revocation order, this court first determines whether competent substantial evidence supported the finding of a willful and substantial violation. Timke v. State , 313 So. 3d 714, 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020). If so, this court then determines whether the trial court abused its discretion in revoking probation.

  3. Williams v. State

    324 So. 3d 614 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 1 times

    Even accepting Williams' account that he arrived at the beach at 9:30PM, knowingly going to a location that he had never been before so close to curfew represents a substantial risk of non-compliance of which Williams could not have been unaware. Cf.Timke v. State , 313 So. 3d 714, 716–17 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (upholding the lower court's decision to revoke probation when record showed that probationer left his home on a Saturday night to travel to the downtown area of a major city ninety minutes before curfew and arrived home twenty six minutes past curfew). Second, Williams relies on a handful of decisions from other districts.