Opinion
DOCKET NO. CA 16-01092 DOCKET NO. CA 16-01093
07-12-2016
TIMEWISE CLEANING, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LUSH CLEANING SOLUTIONS AND SIRENA E. LUSH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.) TIMEWISE CLEANING, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LUSH CLEANING SOLUTIONS AND SIRENA E. LUSH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
PRESENT:
Appellant having moved to consolidate the appeals and for an extension of time to perfect the appeals taken herein from orders of the Supreme Court entered in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Monroe on September 11, 2015 (appeal No. 1), and April 25, 2016 (appeal No. 2),
Now, upon reading and filing the affidavit of Pamela S.C. Reynolds, Esq., sworn to June 24, 2016, and the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks to consolidate the appeals is granted, and the appeals from the orders entered September 11, 2015, and April 25, 2016, are hereby consolidated for the purposes of perfecting and arguing the appeals, and
It is further ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks an extension of time to perfect appeal No. 1 is granted, and appellant shall perfect the appeal on or before September 12, 2016, and, in the event of failure to so perfect, the appeal is hereby dismissed without further order, and
It is further ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks an extension of time to perfect appeal No. 2 is dismissed as premature (see 22 NYCRR 1000.13 [f]).
Entered: July 12, 2016
Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk