From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Dep't

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 7, 2023
No. 23-11239 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 7, 2023)

Opinion

23-11239

08-07-2023

KYLE JORDAN TIMCO, Plaintiff, v. STERLING HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

NANCY G. EDMUNDS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 18, 2023, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to clarify in writing within ten days whether he intends to voluntarily dismiss the claims in this case in light of a notice of voluntary dismissal he filed in a similar, earlier case that included the same claims against the same parties. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff was put on notice that failure to respond to the Court's order may result in the dismissal of this case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Id.)

To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's order. Thus, under Rule 41(b), Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on August 7, 2023, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.


Summaries of

Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Dep't

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 7, 2023
No. 23-11239 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:KYLE JORDAN TIMCO, Plaintiff, v. STERLING HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 7, 2023

Citations

No. 23-11239 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 7, 2023)