noting that common carriers "serve all comers at a general, publicly disclosed rate," whereas contract carriers "enter into private contracts authorized by the [Interstate Commerce] Act."
Summary of this case from Estate of B.J. McAdams v. Sugar Foods Corp.No. 84-1761.
June 24, 1985.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE WHITE and JUSTICE BLACKMUN would grant certiorari. Reported below: 749 F. 2d 1378.
noting that common carriers "serve all comers at a general, publicly disclosed rate," whereas contract carriers "enter into private contracts authorized by the [Interstate Commerce] Act."
Summary of this case from Estate of B.J. McAdams v. Sugar Foods Corp.Full title:TIMBERLANE LUMBER CO. ET AL. v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST SAVINGS…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 24, 1985
However, Illinois has a strong public policy to insure that workers covered by the Workers' Compensation Act…
Scott v. AndersonAs noted by the Ohio Supreme Court, "while a conviction under R.C. § 2903.01(B) cannot be sustained unless…