From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tilmon-Jones v. Bridgeport Music, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 12, 2013
Case No. 06-14048 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 06-14048

04-12-2013

JANYCE H. TILMON-JONES, individually and in her capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Abrim Tilmon, Jr., Plaintiff, v. BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC., a Michigan corporation, and ARMEN BOLADIAN, an individual, Defendants.


Hon. John Corbett O'Meara


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Before the court is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of this court's September 26, 2012 order granting Defendants' motion for sanctions. With leave of court, Defendants filed a response. Plaintiff also seeks leave to file a supplemental declaration in support of her motion for reconsideration and requests that the court take judicial notice of a complaint filed in the District of Maryland.

The standard for granting a motion for reconsideration is as follows:

Generally, and without restricting the court's discretion, the court will not grant motions for rehearing or reconsideration which merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. The movant shall not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled but also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case.
LR 7.1(h)(3). A motion for reconsideration "is not properly used as a vehicle to re-hash old arguments or to advance positions that could have been argued earlier but were not." Smith v. Mount Pleasant Schools, 298 F. Supp.2d 636, 637 (E.D. Mich. 2003) (citing Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Engler, 146 F.3d 357, 374 (6th Cir. 1998)).

After reviewing the extensive briefing in this case, the court concludes that Plaintiff has raised arguments that were already considered by the court or should have been raised originally. Plaintiff has not demonstrated that reconsideration is warranted here. The court further finds that Plaintiff's supplemental filings (Docket Nos. 133 and 134) are not relevant to the matter at hand.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's October 10, 2012 motion for reconsideration is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's March 5, 2013 motions for judicial notice (Docket No. 133) and for leave to file supplemental declaration (Docket No. 134) are DENIED.

John Corbett O'Meara

United States District Judge

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on this date, April 12, 2013, using the ECF system.

William Barkholz

Case Manager


Summaries of

Tilmon-Jones v. Bridgeport Music, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 12, 2013
Case No. 06-14048 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Tilmon-Jones v. Bridgeport Music, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JANYCE H. TILMON-JONES, individually and in her capacity as Personal…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. 06-14048 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 12, 2013)