From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tillman v. Wise

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 13, 2020
236 A.3d 1089 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)

Summary

applying the gist of the action doctrine and concluding that claim sounded in tort and not breach of contract where complaint did not allege that contractor failed to install flooring but that installation was defective

Summary of this case from Johnstone v. Raffaele

Opinion

No. 657 MDA 2019

04-13-2020

Karen K. TILLMAN, Appellant v. Chris WISE t/d/b/a Wise Property Management


Non-Precedential Decision See Pa. Superior Court Internal operating Procedures, § 65.37 before citing

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Tillman v. Wise

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 13, 2020
236 A.3d 1089 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)

applying the gist of the action doctrine and concluding that claim sounded in tort and not breach of contract where complaint did not allege that contractor failed to install flooring but that installation was defective

Summary of this case from Johnstone v. Raffaele
Case details for

Tillman v. Wise

Case Details

Full title:KAREN K. TILLMAN Appellant v. CHRIS WISE T/D/B/A WISE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 13, 2020

Citations

236 A.3d 1089 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)

Citing Cases

Johnstone v. Raffaele

More recently, this Court has applied the gist of the action doctrine to bar contract claims when the action…