From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 13, 1934
191 N.E. 518 (N.Y. 1934)

Opinion

Argued February 27, 1934

Decided March 13, 1934

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Borris M. Komar for appellant.

Maurice Leon and Andre Maximov for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs. The effect of the ex parte order at Special Term was merely to create a notation on the record of valid action taken by the Federal court. First question certified in the affirmative. Second question certified not answered. No opinion. (See 264 N.Y. 670.)

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ. Not sitting: KELLOGG, J.


Summaries of

Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 13, 1934
191 N.E. 518 (N.Y. 1934)
Case details for

Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank

Case Details

Full title:JAMES A. TILLMAN, Appellant, v. RUSSO-ASIATIC BANK, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 13, 1934

Citations

191 N.E. 518 (N.Y. 1934)
191 N.E. 518

Citing Cases

Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 264 N.Y.…