From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tillman v. Murphy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00196-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Nov. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00196-WYD-CBS

11-06-2012

LOUIS E. TILLMAN, Plaintiffs, v. TIMOTHY R. MURPHY, and MHC KENWORTH, Defendants.


ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

Daniel, Chief Judge

Plaintiff has submitted a Notice of Appeal. Plaintiff previously was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in this court in this action. The court has examined the file and has determined that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal must be denied. Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court finds that this appeal is not taken in good faith because plaintiff has not shown the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because this appeal is not taken in good faith.

BY THE COURT:

____________

WILEY Y. DANIEL,

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tillman v. Murphy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00196-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Nov. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Tillman v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS E. TILLMAN, Plaintiffs, v. TIMOTHY R. MURPHY, and MHC KENWORTH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 6, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00196-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Nov. 6, 2012)