From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tillman v. Keefe Commissary Network Sales

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 7, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-1527 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 7, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-1527.

April 7, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2010, the Court having entered an Order [Doc 3] granting the Plaintiffs Motion for IFP status [Doc. 1], docketed his Complaint [4] and a Notice of Change of Address [Doc. 2], mailed a copy of its Order to the address provided, has had that Order returned by the U. S. Postal Service marked "return to sender, refused, unable to forward." Because the Court no way to communicate with the Plaintiff regarding his case, the Magistrate Judge prepared a Report and Recommendation [Doc. 6] recommending that this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute. A copy of the Report and Recommendation, was mailed to the Plaintiff at his last known address. Per the docket entry reflecting the filing of that Report and Recommendation, a copy of which was also sent to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff was notified that Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by April 5, 2010. No Objections were filed, and the Court has not received any other communication from the Plaintiff.

Therefore, upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the Opinion of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to mark this case closed.


Summaries of

Tillman v. Keefe Commissary Network Sales

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 7, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-1527 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Tillman v. Keefe Commissary Network Sales

Case Details

Full title:JOHN TILLMAN also known as FREDERICK TILLMAN, Plaintiff v. KEEFE…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 7, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-1527 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 7, 2010)