From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tillman v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 4, 2010
Case No. 5:10-CV-00132-SWW/JTK (E.D. Ark. Jun. 4, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 5:10-CV-00132-SWW/JTK.

June 4, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner is hereby informed of his opportunity to reply within thirty (30) days to Respondent's arguments in his Response (DE #6) that the petition should be dismissed because Petitioner did not present his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in a timely manner so as to allow state-court review and the claims are now procedurally barred. Petitioner may also reply to Respondent's arguments that his actual innocence claim is not cognizable, or alternatively, that it is procedurally barred and that the fourth claim — he was denied the right to pursue post-conviction relief — is not cognizable. Petitioner may reply to any other argument in the Response.

The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of the Response (DE #6) and this Order on Petitioner by regular mail.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tillman v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 4, 2010
Case No. 5:10-CV-00132-SWW/JTK (E.D. Ark. Jun. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Tillman v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE TILLMAN, JR. PETITIONER ADC #131098 v. RAY HOBBS, Interim Director…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Jun 4, 2010

Citations

Case No. 5:10-CV-00132-SWW/JTK (E.D. Ark. Jun. 4, 2010)