From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tillman v. Board of Prison Terms

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 22, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0816 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0816 KJN P.

April 22, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's April 14, 2011 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.

DATED: April 21, 2011


Summaries of

Tillman v. Board of Prison Terms

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 22, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0816 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Tillman v. Board of Prison Terms

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY B. TILLMAN, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 22, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0816 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2011)