From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tillery v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Oct 28, 1957
135 A.2d 451 (Md. 1957)

Opinion

[H.C. No. 21, September Term, 1957.]

Decided October 28, 1957.

HABEAS CORPUS — Re-Trying Case. Habeas corpus cannot be used to re-try a criminal case. p. 624

HABEAS CORPUS — Arrest — Legality of — Preliminary Hearing — Failure to Grant. The legality of an arrest and the failure to grant petitioner a preliminary hearing are matters to be raised on appeal, and do not constitute grounds for issuing a writ of habeas corpus. p. 624

HABEAS CORPUS — Bail — Denial of. After conviction the denial of bail will not support the writ of habeas corpus Furthermore, in this proceeding the records showed that bail was set for petitioner. pp. 624-625

J.E.B.

Decided October 28, 1957.

Habeas corpus proceeding by Leon Tillery against the Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary. From a refusal of the writ, petitioner applied for leave to appeal.

Application denied, with costs.

Before BRUNE, C.J., and COLLINS, HENDERSON, HAMMOND and PRESCOTT, JJ.


This is an application for leave to appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus by Judge Cullen of the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City. Petitioner was tried and convicted on a narcotics charge in the Criminal Court of Baltimore and sentenced to five years in the Maryland State Penitentiary on November 13, 1956.

The contentions of the petitioner follow: (1) that he was illegally arrested; (2) that he was afforded no preliminary hearing; (3) that he was not allowed bail; and (4) that he did not receive a fair trial.

The petition contains little more than a review of the facts which were submitted to the jury. Habeas corpus cannot be used to re-try a criminal case. Canter v. Warden, 207 Md. 616, 617.

Legality of arrest and failure to grant petitioner a preliminary hearing are matters to be raised on appeal and do not constitute grounds for the issuance of habeas corpus. Spence v. Warden, 204 Md. 661, 662; Hickman v. Warden, 203 Md. 668, 669.

Petitioner's contention concerning bail is without merit. Judge Cullen, in denying the writ of habeas corpus in the lower court, states: "The records of the Criminal Court show that bail of three thousand dollars was set for the petitioner by one of the Judges of the Supreme Bench * * *." In any event, after conviction the denial of bail will not support the writ of habeas corpus. Daisey v. Warden, 203 Md. 653, 654.

Application denied, with costs.


Summaries of

Tillery v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Oct 28, 1957
135 A.2d 451 (Md. 1957)
Case details for

Tillery v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:TILLERY v . WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Oct 28, 1957

Citations

135 A.2d 451 (Md. 1957)
135 A.2d 451

Citing Cases

Culley v. Warden

The applicant, who has filed more than twenty petitions for writs of habeas corpus and "mandamus," by his…