From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TILL v. SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 30, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-1795 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-1795.

March 30, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 30th day of March 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint [docket entry No. 15], Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint [docket entry No. 17], Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [docket entry No. 20], Plaintiffs' Sur-Reply Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [docket entry No. 23], and for reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

TILL v. SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 30, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-1795 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2010)
Case details for

TILL v. SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC TILL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 30, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-1795 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2010)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Judge Technical Servs. Inc.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) allows a party to move for dismissal of any claim for which the…