Opinion
Case No. 4:11-cv-00504-SBA
10-28-2011
DAWN TILL and MARY JOSEPHS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SAKS INCORPORATED, a Tennessee corporation; SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, INC., a Massachusetts corporation; SAKS & COMPANY, a New York corporation; and SAKS FIFTH AVENUE OFF FIFTH, Defendants.
H. Tim Hoffman (SBN 49141) Arthur W. Lazear (SBN 83603) Chad A. Saunders (SBN 257810) HOFFMAN & LAZEAR Oakland, CA 94612 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAWN TILL and MARY JOSEPHS Jennifer B. Zargarof (SBN 204382) Geoffrey D. DeBoskey (SBN 211557) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Attorneys for Defendants SAKS INCORPORATED, SAKS & COMPANY and SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, INC.
H. Tim Hoffman (SBN 49141)
Arthur W. Lazear (SBN 83603)
Chad A. Saunders (SBN 257810)
HOFFMAN & LAZEAR
Oakland, CA 94612
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DAWN TILL and MARY JOSEPHS
Jennifer B. Zargarof (SBN 204382)
Geoffrey D. DeBoskey (SBN 211557)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
SAKS INCORPORATED, SAKS & COMPANY and
SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, INC.
Assigned to: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DENY CLASS CERTIFICATION AND REJECT CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among Plaintiffs Dawn Till and Mary Josephs ("Plaintiffs") through their counsel, and Defendant Saks Incorporated, Saks & Company, and Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc., ("Saks") through their counsel, (collectively, the "Parties") to the following pursuant to Civil L.Rs. 6-2 and 7-12:
1. On September 28, 2011 Saks filed its Motion to Deny Class Certification and Reject Conditional Certification (the "Motion"). The hearing on the Motion was set by the Court for February 28, 2012.
2. The Parties have met and conferred, and have agreed to the following briefing schedule for the Motion: Plaintiffs must file and serve any opposition papers to Saks' Motion on or before November 25, 2011 and Saks must file any reply papers on or before December 21, 2011. This is the first request to modify the briefing schedule on Saks' Motion.
4. The Parties reserve the right to seek Court approval for further modification to the briefing or to make other applications to the Court regarding the hearing date and/or briefing schedule in connection with the Motion.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
HOFFMAN & LAZEAR
By: Chad A. Saunders
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
Sidley Austin LLP
By:
Jennifer B. Zargarof
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong
Judge of the United States District Court