Summary
holding that the chain of custody was established even though there was a two-day gap from when the evidence was collected to when it was logged in to the police evidence locker, and the person testifying to the procedures used in logging in evidence was a new employee. hired four months after the defendant was arrested
Summary of this case from State v. McDowellOpinion
Docket No. 419, 1998.
May 3, 1999.
Appeal from Superior Court, Kent County, CrA K97-09-0327I-0329I and K97-09-0347I-0349I.
AFFIRMED.