From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tikal v. Warden Ma'at

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jun 22, 2021
CASE NO. 2:21-CV-00023 SEC P (W.D. La. Jun. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-00023

06-22-2021

ALAN TIKAL #69252-097 v. WARDEN MA'AT


SEC P

KAY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JUDGMENT

JAMES D. CAIN, JR. JUDGE

Before the court is a Report and Recommendation [doc. 8] of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus [doc. 1] be denied and dismissed with prejudice for failure to exhaust. The court has conducted an independent review of the record, as well as the objections filed by petitioner [doc. 9], and finds that the Report and Recommendation is correct under applicable law. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [doc. 8] be ADOPTED, that the petition [doc. 1] be DENIED and DISMISSED, without prejudice to petitioner's right to bring a new petition upon completion of proper exhaustion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's Motion to Amend [doc. 10] be DENIED, as it fails to change the grounds on which the petition is dismissed.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tikal v. Warden Ma'at

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jun 22, 2021
CASE NO. 2:21-CV-00023 SEC P (W.D. La. Jun. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Tikal v. Warden Ma'at

Case Details

Full title:ALAN TIKAL #69252-097 v. WARDEN MA'AT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Jun 22, 2021

Citations

CASE NO. 2:21-CV-00023 SEC P (W.D. La. Jun. 22, 2021)