From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tiger v. Nolen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 4, 1920
190 P. 263 (Okla. 1920)

Opinion

No. 9680

Opinion Filed May 4, 1920.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Indians — Inherited Lands — Partition — Jurisdiction.

On July 6, 1909, the district courts of this state had jurisdiction of an action to partition inherited lands of mixed-blood Indians, including minors, and were authorized to decree a sale of such lands if found to be incapable of partition by the commissioners appointed by said courts.

Error from District Court, Hughes County; Geo. C. Crump, Judge.

Diamond Sherrow, for plaintiffs in error.

Skinner Bailey, for defendants in error.

Action by Ewnah J. Tiger and another against James M. Nolen and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error. Affirmed.


It was stipulated in this case as follows:

"The defendants in error filed a demurrer to the petition of the plaintiffs in error, and upon said demurrer coming on for hearing, the parties having agreed in open court that the sole and only question of law to be determined by the court was whether or not the district court could partition the land of a full-blood Indian inherited by a seven-eighths-blood minor."

This stipulation eliminates from the case everything, as stated, except the sole question of law, "Whether or not the district court of this state could partition the land of a full-blood Indian inherited by a seven-eighths-blood minor." This court has recently answered that question in the affirmative in the case of Seth Salmon et al. v. Miley Johnson, 78 Okla. 182, in an opinion by Mr. Justice Rainey, decided at the present term (April 6, 1920).

The question of law decided in said cause is controlling in the instant case, being the identical question herein involved.

Under the rule of law announced in cause No. 9717, and the authorities there cited, it is ordered that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Tiger v. Nolen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 4, 1920
190 P. 263 (Okla. 1920)
Case details for

Tiger v. Nolen

Case Details

Full title:TIGER et al. v. NOLEN et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: May 4, 1920

Citations

190 P. 263 (Okla. 1920)
190 P. 263

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Green

" We do not find that this court has departed from the rule announced in the above case, but the rule was…

Grease v. McNac

In Cowokochee v. Chapman, the court, basing its opinion upon Lamb v. Baker and Hughes Land Co. v. Bailey,…