Opinion
Case No. C04-5052RBL.
August 21, 2007
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant PUD's Emergency Motion Regarding the Sufficiency of the Supersedeas Bond [Dkt. #324]. The motion seeks to have the defendant's attorneys named as the beneficiary of the bond. That motion is DENIED. Plaintiff TIG has filed a Motion for Approval of Supersedeas Bond and Stay pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(d) [Dkt. #326] and has noted it for August 29, 2007. The Court will rule on that motion on its noting date.