From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tierney v. Perkins

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Apr 5, 2012
NO. SCPW-12-0000163 (Haw. Apr. 5, 2012)

Opinion

NO. SCPW-12-0000163 Criminal No. 08-1-0869

04-05-2012

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE RICHARD K. PERKINS, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C. Tierney's petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, April 5, 2012.

Mark E. Recktenwald

Paula A. Nakayama

Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

James E. Duffy, Jr.

Sabrina S. McKenna


Summaries of

Tierney v. Perkins

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Apr 5, 2012
NO. SCPW-12-0000163 (Haw. Apr. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Tierney v. Perkins

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE RICHARD K. PERKINS, JUDGE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Apr 5, 2012

Citations

NO. SCPW-12-0000163 (Haw. Apr. 5, 2012)