From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tiemens v. Dickinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 19, 2010
No. 2:10-cv-3054 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-3054 JFM (HC).

November 19, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

The application attacks a conviction issued by the Sonoma County Superior Court, which is in the Northern District of California. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Sonoma County. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

DATED: November 18, 2010.


Summaries of

Tiemens v. Dickinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 19, 2010
No. 2:10-cv-3054 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Tiemens v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN TIEMENS, JR., Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 19, 2010

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-3054 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2010)