From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tiburcio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 27, 2012
95 So. 3d 1037 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Summary

reversing dismissal of charges because five years had not elapsed

Summary of this case from State v. Carey

Opinion

No. 5D12–2296.

2012-08-27

Danny TIBURCIO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, et al., Respondent.

Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Margaret H. Schreiber, Judge. Robert Wesley, Public Defender, and Daniel S. Spencer, Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Megan Saillant, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.


Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Margaret H. Schreiber, Judge.
Robert Wesley, Public Defender, and Daniel S. Spencer, Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Megan Saillant, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks release from the Florida State Hospital because he is incompetent to proceed on his criminal charges and cannot be restored to competency in the foreseeable future. Petitioner also seeks dismissal of the pending charges. The State concedes that Petitioner's continued detention is unlawful, but argues that the dismissal of the charges is premature because five years have not elapsed since Petitioner was found incompetent. SeeFla. R.Crim. P. 3.213(a)(1). We agree with the State on both issues.

Accordingly, we grant the Petition in part and deny it in part. We direct the trial court to order Petitioner's release. Although the State has indicated that it does not intend to seek civil commitment at this time, this decision is without prejudice to the State instituting civil commitment proceedings.

PETITION GRANTED IN PART; DENIED IN PART.

ORFINGER, C.J., TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tiburcio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 27, 2012
95 So. 3d 1037 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

reversing dismissal of charges because five years had not elapsed

Summary of this case from State v. Carey

reversing dismissal of charges because five years had not elapsed

Summary of this case from State v. Benninghoff

rejecting as premature a claim that charges should be dismissed “because five years have not elapsed since Petitioner was found incompetent”

Summary of this case from Cruz v. State
Case details for

Tiburcio v. State

Case Details

Full title:Danny TIBURCIO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, et al., Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Aug 27, 2012

Citations

95 So. 3d 1037 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

State v. Carey

Because the five-year period of time has not yet passed, we find no error in the trial court's ruling that…

State v. Benninghoff

Cases reviewing the dismissal of charges, pursuant to section 916.145, Florida Statutes, and rule 3.213 of…