From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tibbs v. Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of Franklin

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 6, 1971
284 A.2d 179 (N.J. 1971)

Summary

affirming "substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Kolovsky"

Summary of this case from Rockwell v. William Paterson Univ.

Opinion

Argued November 8 and 22, 1971 —

Decided December 6, 1971.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Leonard N. Arnold argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. William J. Zaino, Somerset County Legal Services, argued the cause for the respondents ( Mr. James B. Ventantonio, Director; Messrs. Michael D. Lang, William J. Zaino and Joseph Lipofsky, Somerset County Legal Services, on the brief).


The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Kolovsky. ( 114 N.J. Super. 287)

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Tibbs v. Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of Franklin

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 6, 1971
284 A.2d 179 (N.J. 1971)

affirming "substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Kolovsky"

Summary of this case from Rockwell v. William Paterson Univ.
Case details for

Tibbs v. Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of Franklin

Case Details

Full title:TANYA TIBBS, INFANT, BY HER GUARDIANS, MR. AND MRS. HAROLD DIGGS, NELLIE…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 6, 1971

Citations

284 A.2d 179 (N.J. 1971)
284 A.2d 179

Citing Cases

Rockwell v. William Paterson Univ.

Further, it is uncontested that S.B. was not a student at WPU at the time of the UHB hearing because she took…

Odenheim v. Carlstadt-East Rutherford Regional School District

N.J.S.A. 18A:37-2(j); Board of Education, Policy No. 5114. New Jersey Courts have mandated that such policy…