From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thurston v. Navarro

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 12, 1989
546 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Summary

granting petition for writ of habeas corpus and quashing involuntary commitment order where trial court rejected uncontroverted expert medical opinion testimony that defendant did not meet criteria for involuntary commitment

Summary of this case from Morrow v. State

Opinion

No. 89-1531.

July 12, 1989.

Petition from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Robert W. Tyson, Jr., J.

William R. Amlong, of Amlong Amlong, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Deborah Guller, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondents.


We grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus, quash the order under review, remand for further proceedings, and accordingly, order petitioner released forthwith.

Prior to the trial court finding petitioner not guilty by reason of insanity, three court appointed doctors and two privately retained doctors each found petitioner did not meet the criteria for involuntary commitment under section 916.15, Florida Statutes (1987). After finding petitioner not guilty by reason of insanity, without any other expert testimony being presented, the trial court found petitioner met such criteria and ordered her committed to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services to be placed in a mental health treatment facility.

The trial court improperly chose to reject the uncontradicted expert opinion testimony that petitioner did not meet the criteria for involuntary commitment.

We do not foreclose the State from seeking whatever treatment of petitioner is permitted by law to insure her safety and the safety of others. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.217(b).

DELL, WALDEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thurston v. Navarro

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 12, 1989
546 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

granting petition for writ of habeas corpus and quashing involuntary commitment order where trial court rejected uncontroverted expert medical opinion testimony that defendant did not meet criteria for involuntary commitment

Summary of this case from Morrow v. State
Case details for

Thurston v. Navarro

Case Details

Full title:MAE FRANCIS THURSTON, PETITIONER, v. NICK NAVARRO, AS SHERIFF OF BROWARD…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 12, 1989

Citations

546 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Reynolds v. State

[1–3] A petition seeking habeas relief is an appropriate vehicle to challenge the trial court’s commitment of…

Morrow v. State

In light of the expert medical opinions here, finding that Morrow did not meet the criteria for involuntary…