From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thurston v. Bear Naked, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 23, 2011
CASE NO.: 3:11-cv-04678-RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:11-cv-04678-RS

11-23-2011

CHANEE THURSTON and LAWRENCE G. KNOWLES, III, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BEAR NAKED, INC., Defendant.

STEMBER FEINSTEIN DOYLE & PAYNE, LLC Joseph N. Kravec, Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiffs JENNER & BLOCK Kenneth K. Lee Attorneys for Defendant Bear Naked, Inc.


Michael D. Braun (Bar No. 167416)

BRAUN LAW GROUP, P.C.

Janet Lindner Spielberg (Bar No. 221926)

LAW OFFICE OF JANET

LINDNER SPIELBERG

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Joseph N. Kravec, Jr. (pro hac vice)

Wyatt A. Lison (pro hac to be filed)

Maureen Davidson-Welling (pro hac to be filed)

STEMBER FEINSTEIN

DOYLE & PAYNE, LLC

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING HEARING AND BRIEFING

SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO TRANSFER

Judge: Honorable Richard Seeborg

WHEREAS, on November 10, 2011, Defendant Bear Naked, Inc. ("Bear Naked") filed a Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) ("Motion to Transfer"), which is currently set for hearing on December 15, 2011;

WHEREAS, the Parties have been discussing a way to resolve Bear Naked's Motion to Transfer without need of court intervention and, given the Thanksgiving holiday, the Parties need additional time to try to come to a resolution;

WHEREAS, there has been one prior extension of time, granting Bear Naked's Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. No. 18);

WHEREAS, this Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay; and

WHEREAS, good cause exists for the modification to the case schedule because it would promote judicial efficiency if the Parties can come to an agreement resolving Bear Naked's Motion to Transfer without the need of court intervention.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through their respective counsel of record as follows:

(a) The hearing on the Motion to Transfer shall be continued to January 5, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3;

(b) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Bear Naked's Motion to Transfer shall be filed and served by December 8, 2011; and

(c) Defendant's Reply shall be filed and served by December 15, 2011.

STEMBER FEINSTEIN DOYLE

& PAYNE, LLC

Joseph N. Kravec, Jr.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JENNER & BLOCK

Kenneth K. Lee

Attorneys for Defendant Bear Naked, Inc.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

Honorable Richard Seeborg


Summaries of

Thurston v. Bear Naked, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 23, 2011
CASE NO.: 3:11-cv-04678-RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Thurston v. Bear Naked, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHANEE THURSTON and LAWRENCE G. KNOWLES, III, on behalf of themselves and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: 3:11-cv-04678-RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)