From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thurmond v. Dick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00629-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Apr. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00629-REB-KMT

04-08-2013

NICK L. THURMOND, Plaintiff, v. CLYDE M. DICK, D.D.S., Defendant.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

The matter before is the recommendation contained within the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#44], filed March 11, 2013. No objections having been filed to the recommendation, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service , 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005). Finding no such error in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted.

"[#44]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. Morales-Fernandez , 418 F.3d at 1122. In addition, because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I have construed his pleadings more liberally and held them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Erickson v. Pardus , 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton , 483 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Bellmon , 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972)).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the recommendation contained within the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#44], filed March 11, 2013, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as orders of this court; and

2. That this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) for failure to effectuate timely service of process.

Dated April 8, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Thurmond v. Dick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00629-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Apr. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Thurmond v. Dick

Case Details

Full title:NICK L. THURMOND, Plaintiff, v. CLYDE M. DICK, D.D.S., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 8, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00629-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Apr. 8, 2013)