From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thurman v. Saxe

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jun 28, 2022
1:21-cv-00186 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 28, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00186

06-28-2022

JAMES W. THURMAN Plaintiff, v. DERREK SAXE; JOE GUY, Sheriff, and JERRY WATTENBERG, Defendants.


JUDGMENT ORDER

CURTIS L. COLLIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Christopher H. Steger filed a report and recommendation (the “R&R”) on whether Plaintiff's action was frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (Doc. 14 at 1.) Plaintiff brought a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants came to his house on November 11, 2021, to discuss a gun and that they did not wear masks while doing so. Plaintiff alleges that he could have died because they did not wear masks. (Id.) The R&R recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice because the action is frivolous and there “is no constitutional cause of action solely for moral indignation.” (Id. at 2.) Specifically, “Plaintiff does not allege that he became ill after Defendants' visit, nor does he state which constitutional provision Defendants allegedly violated.” (Id. at 1.) Neither party has objected to the R&R within fourteen days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with the R&R (Doc. 14). The Court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the R&R (Doc. 14), and the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thurman v. Saxe

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jun 28, 2022
1:21-cv-00186 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Thurman v. Saxe

Case Details

Full title:JAMES W. THURMAN Plaintiff, v. DERREK SAXE; JOE GUY, Sheriff, and JERRY…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Jun 28, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-00186 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 28, 2022)