From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thurman v. Allstate Indemnity Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 15, 1989
544 So. 2d 346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1810.

June 15, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; George N. Diamantis, Judge.

Charles R. Steinberg of Steinberg Stutin, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Chris Ballentine of Fisher, Rushmer, Werrenrath, Keiner, Wack Dickson, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

GOSHORN, J., concurs specially with opinion.


I concur because the parties stipulated that this case could be decided by summary judgment even though certain material facts were in dispute. The trial judge, therefore, was free to chose which disputed fact to believe and which to disbelieve. Under these circumstances, we must affirm the trial court.


Summaries of

Thurman v. Allstate Indemnity Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 15, 1989
544 So. 2d 346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Thurman v. Allstate Indemnity Company

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD THURMAN, APPELLANT, v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 15, 1989

Citations

544 So. 2d 346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)