From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thuna v. Di Sanza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 30, 1980
78 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Summary

In Thuna the issue of the tenant's "primary residence" and "physical occupancy", was found to be immaterial because though required under the offering plan, tenant enjoyed the status of a rent-stabilized tenant and under subdivisions 4 and 5 of section 61 of the Rent Stabilization Code, the sponsor was required to offer shares to " lessees of record of vacant or subleased apartments at the time of the offering".

Summary of this case from Wissner v. 15 West 72nd

Opinion

September 30, 1980


Resettled order and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 15, 1980, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion.

Concur — Sandler, J.P., Ross, Markewich, Silverman and Bloom, JJ. [ 102 Misc.2d 342.]


Summaries of

Thuna v. Di Sanza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 30, 1980
78 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

In Thuna the issue of the tenant's "primary residence" and "physical occupancy", was found to be immaterial because though required under the offering plan, tenant enjoyed the status of a rent-stabilized tenant and under subdivisions 4 and 5 of section 61 of the Rent Stabilization Code, the sponsor was required to offer shares to " lessees of record of vacant or subleased apartments at the time of the offering".

Summary of this case from Wissner v. 15 West 72nd
Case details for

Thuna v. Di Sanza

Case Details

Full title:LEONORA THUNA, Respondent-Appellant, v. FILIP M. DI SANZA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1980

Citations

78 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Wissner v. 15 West 72nd

On plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in his favor in this action wherein plaintiff seeks to enforce the…