From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

THRO v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1165 EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1165 EFB.

October 20, 2011


ORDER


Based on 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), counsel for plaintiff in the above-entitled action seeks an award of attorney fees in the amount of $8,141.69, which totals 25 percent of past benefits due to plaintiff up to the month of the court's decision remanding the case for payment of benefits. Dckt. No. 21. Plaintiff entered into a Retainer and Contingent Fee Agreement with plaintiff's counsel which states that he would pay plaintiff's counsel 25 percent of any past-due benefits he won as a result of the appeal in his case, plus expenses. Id., Ex. 3.

Defendant takes no position on the reasonableness of plaintiff's counsel's request. See Dckt. No. 22.

42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A) provides, in relevant part:

Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment.

Rather than being paid by the government, fees under the Social Security Act are awarded out of the claimant's disability benefits. Russell v. Sullivan, 930 F.2d 1443, 1446 (9th Cir. 1991), receded from on other grounds, Sorenson v. Mink, 239 F.3d 1140, 1149 (9th Cir. 2001). However, the 25 percent statutory maximum fee is not an automatic entitlement; the court also must ensure that the requested fee is reasonable. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808-09 (2002) ("We hold that § 406(b) does not displace contingent-fee agreements within the statutory ceiling; instead, § 406(b) instructs courts to review for reasonableness fees yielded by those agreements."). "Within the 25 percent boundary . . . the attorney for the successful claimant must show that the fee sought is reasonable for the services rendered." Id. at 807.

After this court found plaintiff to be disabled, he was awarded past-due benefits in the amount of $36,489.49. Dckt. No. 21, Exs. 1, 2. Through September 2010, the month judgment was entered in this case, plaintiff was entitled to $32,566.77. Plaintiff's counsel requests 25 percent of that amount, or $8,141.69. Based on the quality of counsel's representation, her significant experience in the field of Social Security law, and the results achieved in this case, the court finds that amount reasonable.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's counsel is awarded $8,141.69 in attorney fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 406.


Summaries of

THRO v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1165 EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

THRO v. ASTRUE

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN THRO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1165 EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)