From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thrasher v. Genesee Cty. Civil Serv. Comm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 7, 1991
174 A.D.2d 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

June 7, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Genesee County, Wolf, Jr., J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the subject petition, which sought a judgment directing respondents to restore petitioner to her former position as Probation Officer or a judgment annulling the determination to terminate her employment as Child Care Social Worker. As a provisional employee, petitioner could be discharged from the position of Child Care Social Worker at any time without a statement of reasons or a hearing (see, Matter of Preddice v Callanan, 69 N.Y.2d 812; Ranus v Blum, 96 A.D.2d 1144). An employee discharged from a provisional position is not entitled to reinstatement or back pay (Matter of Preddice v Callanan, supra; Matter of Ruggeri v Hall, 101 A.D.2d 934). Further, once an employee has resigned voluntarily from a position in the classified civil service, there is no right to be reinstated to that position (Matter of Doering v Hinrichs, 289 N.Y. 29, 33; Matter of McGill v D'Ambrose, 58 A.D.2d 604). Absent some statute or regulation to the contrary, an employee seeking reinstatement to the position from which she has resigned is deemed to be seeking an initial appointment, and the appointing authority has complete discretion whether to reinstate (or employ) the applicant (Matter of Turel v Delaney, 287 N.Y. 15; Matter of McGill v D'Ambrose, supra). Petitioner was neither transferred nor promoted within the meaning of statutory law or regulations (see, Civil Service Law §§ 61, 63; 4 NYCRR 4.5 [d]; Matter of Engoren v County of Nassau, 163 A.D.2d 520, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 805), and, thus, was not entitled to be restored to her former position as Probation Officer. Finally, to the extent that petitioner now seeks to challenge whether her initial resignation was voluntary, that challenge, raised more than four months after the effective date of the resignation, is time-barred (see, CPLR 217).


Summaries of

Thrasher v. Genesee Cty. Civil Serv. Comm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 7, 1991
174 A.D.2d 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Thrasher v. Genesee Cty. Civil Serv. Comm

Case Details

Full title:JUDITH L. THRASHER, Appellant, v. GENESEE COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1991

Citations

174 A.D.2d 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
572 N.Y.S.2d 187

Citing Cases

In re Igneri

He commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 (1) (c),…